What to do when Police refused to Lodge your FIR ?

Section 154 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with Lodging of FIR. As per Bare Act Language read as Section 154 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 154. Information in cognizable cases.

(1) Every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, if given orally to an officer in charge of a police station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction, and be read Over to the informant; and every such information, whether given in writing or reduced to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by the person giving it, and the substance thereof shall be entered in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the State Government may prescribe in this behalf.

(2) A copy of the information as recorded under sub- section (1) shall be given forthwith, free of cost, to the informant.

(3) Any person aggrieved by a refusal on the part of an officer in charge of a police station to record the information referred to in subsection (1) may send the substance of such information, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned who, if satisfied that such information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, shall either investigate the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by any police officer subordinate to him, in the manner provided by this Code, and such officer shall have all the powers of an officer in charge of the police station in relation to that offence.

WHO CAN FILE FIR ?

FIR can be filed by the following persons: 1) By an aggrieved person or somebody on his behalf. (b) hearsay account. 3) By the accused himself

SUPREME COURT GUIDELINES FOR FIR REGISTRATION

 Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P., (2014) 2 SCC 1 wherein it was held that

1. Registration of FIR is mandatory under section 154 of the Code, if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation.

2 If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not.

3. If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered. In cases where preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the entry of such closure must be supplied to the first informant forthwith and not later than one week. It must disclose reasons in brief for closing the complaint and not proceeding further.

4 .The police officer cannot avoid his duty of registering offence if cognizable offence is disclosed. Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

5. The scope of preliminary inquiry is not to verify the veracity or otherwise of the information received but only to ascertain whether the information reveals any cognizable offence.

6 .As to what type and in which cases preliminary inquiry is to be conducted will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. The category of cases in which preliminary inquiry may be made are as under:

  1. a) Matrimonial disputes/family disputes
  2. b) Commercial offences
  3. c) Medical negligence cases
  4. d) Corruption cases
  5. e) Cases where there is abnormal delay/laches in initiating criminal prosecution, for example, over 3 months delay in reporting the matter without satisfactorily explaining the reasons for delay.

The aforesaid are only illustrations and not exhaustive of all conditions which may warrant preliminary inquiry.”

PUNISHMENT UNDER INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 FOR POLICE OFFICIAL

Section 166A of IPC read as Whoever, being a public servant,

(a) knowingly disobeys any direction of the law which prohibits him from requiring the attendance at any place of any person for the purpose of investigation into an offence or any other matter, or

(b) knowingly disobeys, to the prejudice of any person, any other direction of the law regulating the manner in which he shall conduct such investigation, or

(c) fails to record any information given to him under sub-section (1) of section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), in relation to cognizable offence punishable under section 326A, section 326B, section 354, section 354B, section 370, section 370A, section 376, section 376A, 2[section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB], section 376E or section 509,

shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Thanks for reading. All the above information is gathered from various websites.

Previous Article

बिटकॉइन क्या है ? / What is Bitcoin ?

Next Article

Things To Search For In A Research Paper Service

You might be interested in …

The Complex Reasons Behind the Support for Police Encounters over the Judiciary in India

In recent years, the issue of police encounters over the judiciary has been a matter of increasing concern in India. While there are various reasons behind this trend, such as a lack of faith in the judicial system and media’s role in shaping public perceptions, the issue is highly complex and multi-faceted. Extrajudicial killings are illegal and violate human rights, and there is a risk that encounters can be used to target innocent people or settle personal and political scores. Therefore, it is essential to address the underlying issues in the legal system and work towards strengthening it so that it can deliver justice in a fair, timely, and effective manner. Only by working together can we create a society that is just and equitable for all its citizens.

Leave a Reply